|
|
|
|
|
by threeseed
493 days ago
|
|
> but version numbers do not make for mature libraries No but they do symbolise a belief amongst the library maintainers that it isn't stable. And so I end up spending an inordinate amount of time refactoring for the latest version. > and the same thing will happen to Rust in 10 years From what I've seen in the last year it won't. Most of the libraries I use have stopped being maintained. The reason Java does so well here is because in enterprise space supporting something for decades is common. |
|