|
|
|
|
|
by gsam
493 days ago
|
|
And that's actually a really honest answer. Whereas someone of the opposite opinion might be like parroting in the general copying-template sense actually generalizes to all observable behaviours because templating systems can be turing-complete or something like that. It's templates-all-the-way-down, including complex induction as long as there is a meta-template to match on its symptoms it can be chained on. Induction is a hard problem, but humans can skip infinite compute time (I don't think we have any reason to believe humans have infinite compute) and still give valid answers. Because there's some (meta)-structure to be exploited. Architecturally if machines / NN can exploit this same structure is a truer question. |
|