|
|
|
|
|
by robocat
501 days ago
|
|
> For example, it would be fairer if the years I worked for no income created tax-deductible losses against future income. Hard to avoid cheaters. A policy could be that the government could pay for 2 years of current salary and you only get one chance per person -- however I can't imagine how the government could get that into the budget. The policy I implied is be to reward winners with a tax break to offset their risk. Difficult to sell to any voters that don't understand risk/reward or voters that believe business owners are greedy worthless bâtards. Ha: if the business fails you lose money (the wages you didn't receive), and if the business wins you are taxed: "Privatise the losses, socialise the gains" ;) |
|