|
|
|
|
|
|
by bb88
504 days ago
|
|
|
The problem with 45 years of C++ is that different eras used different features. If you have 3 million lines of C++ code written in the 1990's that still compiles and works today, should you use new 202x C++ features? I still feel the sting of being bit by C++ features from the 1990s that turned out to be footguns. Honestly, I kinda like the idea of "wrapper" languages. Typescript/Kotlin/Carbon. |
|
|
I was expecting that someone would have posted this by now:
How to Shoot Yourself In the Foot:
https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~ss44/joke/foot.htm