|
|
|
|
|
by kalekold
498 days ago
|
|
> This is NOT because I hate Rust. While not my favourite language it's definitively one of the best new ones and I encourage people to use it for new projects where it fits. I do not want it anywhere near a huge C code base that I need to maintain. Seems pretty clear cut to me. Why do rust developers demand everything be re-written in their language? Especially one of the longest running, largest and most successful C projects of all time? It was never going to work out. There are a few brand new operating systems being developed in rust, why not contribute to them instead? |
|
I'm pretty sure Torvalds is the one who decided to add Rust to the Linux kernel.
> I was expecting updates to be faster, but part of the problem is that old-time kernel developers are used to C and don't know Rust. They're not exactly excited about having to learn a new language that is, in some respects, very different. So there's been some pushback on Rust. - Linus Torvalds https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-talks-ai-rust-a...