|
|
|
|
|
|
by badRNG
498 days ago
|
|
|
> we expect, with Popper, that all our best theories of fundamental physics are going to be superseded eventually This inductive case against scientific knowledge should only serve to decrease our second-order credence in the proposition that we have assigned the highest credence to the scientific hypotheses that most closely correspond with reality. It does nothing to change the fact that, conditional on evidence we currently have, we may very well have correctly proportioned credence. |
|
|