Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by picafrost 494 days ago
This number doesn't surprise me. I live within the Arctic circle and there are a lot of wood ants [0] in my area. Among the various reasons wood ants are fascinating (aphid farming, formic acid spitting/squirting) is that they live in very large mounds that can reach several feet high.

Each of these mounds are estimated to have a population ranging from 100,000 to over one million and there can be dozens of them within a 100m × 100m square. I imagine it similar to the state of New York full of NYCs, just a few miles between each. A Finnish study found that these mounds can be connected into super-colonies which span kilometers. [1]

I have also lived in California and have experienced red ants beginning to stake out territory near or in my home. Remember that they are not there just because of the food sources, but in spite of us making the terrain otherwise utterly inhospitable to them with pavement, insecticide, diatomaceous earth, and all of that. And still they can be incredibly difficult to get rid of.

The way they operate as a colony makes them very interesting. I can see why so many people have caught the ant-fascination bug.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formica

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27859791/

2 comments

Growing up in an area with big ant hills, I just can't wrap my head around the fact that there are more ants by weight than all other mammals combined. Because I can imagine a small forest with multiple of these ant hills which undoubtedly have millions of ants, but at the same time an apartment building with a few humans in it would surely outweigh all of those ants. So where are all the ants hiding?
They specify wild mammals. Humans are like 600 megatons I think.
Wow. That shows how much wildlife we've killed off.

Whales, buffalo, elephants, and the list goes on. In a balanced world, I feel like we shouldn't have more mass than the total of all these massive creatures.

I wonder in what year human biomass passed wild mammal biomass.

Pretty sure it's less the reduced wildlife and more the efficient food production of / for humans. Modern agriculture is crazy efficient compared to grazing, foraging and such - in forests, where the relatively "unproductive" trees get most of the light.
60 megatons. Study mentions that the 12 megatons of ants are equivalent to 20% of the total human mass.
About 500 megatons. 7e9 humans * 0.075 tons/human / 1e6 tons/megaton
No, 600 megatons (~E12 kg) is closer. There are E10 humans and we weigh E2 kg. More precisely: 6E1 kg * 8E9 = 5.6E11
Numbers are to be considered about dehydrated mass, again according to the study.
Interesting. I didn’t read the study. I wonder if that favors smaller animals? Are large mammals a larger fraction water?
Ants are aliens aren't they. Or at least we might be more likely to find antlike creatures if we do find extraterrestrial life.
"Children of Time" by Adrian Tchaikovsky is an excellent sci-fi novel that also includes ants that were uplifted by a human terraforming experiment.

They're interesting semi-aliens because the colonies are incredibly capable in many respects but ultimately lack self-awareness, which leaves the ants open to manipulation by other uplifted species that are capable of motivated planning. The ants become like biological technology for the other species.

> Ants are aliens aren't they.

That reminds me of Phase IV. It's like an alien invasion movie, but with ants instead: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070531/

Arthropods would probably think we were the aliens considering their taxonomic dominance of Earth since the beginning of the Cambrian Explosion.