|
|
|
|
|
by neonsunset
498 days ago
|
|
There is no need to just throw keywords around. For other readers - more than half of these are irrelevant. Writing general purpose application code rarely involves thinking about implications of most of these (save for NAOT as of lately I suppose). Writing systems C# involves additional learning curve, but if you are already familiar with C++, it comes down to understanding the correct mapping between features, learning strengths and weaknesses of the compiler and the GC and maybe doing a cursory disassembly check now and then, if you care about it. |
|
And while I expect any junior not to know half of them, anyone claiming to be a senior better have an answer, regardless of what I throw at them.
Naturally I don't expect anyone versed in desktop frameworks to master backend and vice-versa, but they better know the bits that relate to desktop in that case, across the whole stack.