|
|
|
|
|
by crazygringo
498 days ago
|
|
Almost nobody wants that though. Content providers want control over presentation. Users want pretty sites. None of this is unique to the web. It's the same reason every magazine has its own attractive layout and formatting, instead of just being a long manuscript in Courier. I like the fact that different sites have different typography. It's an identity that tells me where I am. I understand the appeal of "pure information" without any visual variation ever, but I think that for most people, variety is the spice of life, no? I wouldn't want every site to look the same, for the same reason I wouldn't want everyone to dress like clones. Visual self-expression is part of what it is to be alive. |
|
I think you underestimate the value the world would place on the gains we could get from this kind of design, not to mention that AI would be able to reason about the pages much better. Just the AI angle along is enough to convince society to go along with the change.
But there will need to be some "Killer App" that does this, which everyone else copies.