|
|
|
|
|
by _nalply
507 days ago
|
|
There are two forces fighting with each other: Many protons repel each other with their positve electric charge. But they also attract each other with their strong force. It's complicated but if you simplify you could say too large nuclei tend not to hold together. If you add electric neutral neutrons you have more strong force but the electrical repulsion doesn't increase. So if you have more neutrons, you might have larger nuclei. They measured what happens if some element's isotope has too few neutrons. They were surprised about the extremely short half-times. From that they estimated on the opposite side (again simplifying here!) that very large nuclei with a lot of neutrons could be stabler than known up to today. So: on one side (few neutrons) extremely unstable, so on the other side (more neutrons) stabler than expected? That's what I understood from the article. I have no idea. |
|
This paricular article is about mapping out isotopes close to the proton-drip-line in a heavy synthetic element, with the particular result that excited states can be more long-lived than the ground state of the isotope. This again is nothing particularly new. Generally excited states are short-lived, but there are many known examples of inversion, with the most extreme being a rare, naturally occurring, isotope of Tantalum: Ta-180m. The ground state Ta-180 has a half-life of 8 minutes, while the excited state is de facto stable, with a still unknown half-life in excess of 3*10^17 years [2].
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_tantalum#Tantalum-...