[skeeter2020]

Looked through their privacy policy, and they state the collect and use basically everything they can from your browser & system metadata, to the content you share and/or create. Not that different from every other attempt in the frothy AI space, but a real turn-off and hard no for me.

[jawerty]

Thank you for the feedback. Personally besides using our API server, we would like to find another way to deploy to anyone who has an issue with this/wants to run everything local (not just the client). Also I think if we had a OSS plug and play version where you could enter in your API keys locally it would help us ship to more devs. Would you be interested in this?

[imarkphillips]

I'm so impressed with the concept of this agent but sorry, I can't have you accessing all my corporate data and systems because I access them via browser.

Perhaps you could create both a Public and Corporate version of the extension, like Copilot does. The Corporate version could have access to all browser data but not share it beyond the bounds of the company.

[jawerty]

Thanks! That’s a great point we’ve been discussing how to deal with sensitive data after the launch. I think a corporate/enterprise version makes sense.

[1shooner]

Some analysis I've been reading on the implications of DeepSeek says that model optionality is probably here to stay. If so, I think incorporating model choice would be a valuable aspect of this kind of product. Conversely, I agree with parent: I'm not installing this software with that privacy policy in place.

[artabra]

We definitely wouldn't mind adding that. We are open to a lot of ideas and will consider everything! Appreciate your input so thank you.

[idiotsecant]

Op, any comment on this?