[bradley13]

Ad I understand it, after the initial ruling, the shareholders voted and passed the package again. The judge still disallowed it.

She appears to be ruling based on ideology instead of law.

[dkjaudyeqooe]

You're obviously a great legal scholar. Did you read the ruling?

The "passed the package again" tried to resurrect the original incentive payments, retroactively. That was disallowed.

[JumpCrisscross]

Literally the comment below you.