|
|
|
|
|
|
by menaerus
496 days ago
|
|
|
Right, perhaps I was a little bit too vague but what I was trying to say is that by merely sampling the CPU cycles we cannot infer that the foo() was burning CPU because it was memory-bound and which in itself is not an artifact of foo() implementation but rather application-wide threads that happen to saturate the memory bus more quickly. Or is my doubt incorrect? |
|
|