The comments are pretty interesting. There was a discussion about how different they were trying to make the public image about their tech look compared to their actual usage - supposedly to entice more engineers to join.
I think its interesting to attach any company prominently to a database technology since theoretically there would be varied use cases across an org like uber which would likely want different technologies depending on those use cases. Of course they might just have 50 other articles like this for all the other tech they use.
Streaming video at Netflix's scale in the year 2010 was hard though?
I mean sure, it's a lot easier nowadays - but that's mostly down to cloud providers replacing half of the server-side challenge with a big bill and fiber making the last mile easier too.
You're massively underestimating the challenge of transferring these vast amounts of data without interrupting service for buffing etc that they had to solve back then
> The [Odin] platform supports 23 technologies, ranging from traditional online databases such as MySQL® and Cassandra® to advanced data platform technologies, including HDFS™, Presto™, and Kafka®.
I think its interesting to attach any company prominently to a database technology since theoretically there would be varied use cases across an org like uber which would likely want different technologies depending on those use cases. Of course they might just have 50 other articles like this for all the other tech they use.