[johndhi]

to be clear, their terms of service are pretty clear that the USER owns the outputs.

[jonathanstrange]

The official stance in the US is currently that there is no copyright on AI output.

[protocolture]

The US ruled that the AI cannot be the author, that doesn't lead like so many clickbait articles suggest, that no AI products can be copyrighted.

1 Activist tried to get the US copyright office to acknowledge his LLM as the author, who would then provide him a license to the work.

There was no issue with himself being the original author and copyright holder of the AI works. But that's not what was being challenged.