|
|
|
|
|
by inglor_cz
498 days ago
|
|
" Once a person grew beyond that age, it‘s life expectancy was just a few years below of where we are today." I strongly disagree. Every single archeological study that I read and that examined ages of skeletons excavated from normal European cemeteries (= not kingly burials etc.) indicated that people over 60 used to be fairly rare (less than one in 10), even in the Early Modern Era, much less so in the Middle Ages. In the Early Middle Ages, with their hunger and frequent raids, even 50 was untypical. Even the most important people of the past, for whom we actually know their ages at death, died way earlier than we do today. Try enumerating the English or the French kings who lived to be 70. Not many, a few individuals over a span of a millennium. It only started getting better post 1750, and really better since 1900. |
|
Caclculate the average life span of french kings who died on natural causes in the last 1000 years. Please return a single number.
* The average lifespan of French kings who died of natural causes over the last 1000 years is approximately 58 years.
This number reflects those kings who did not die in battle, through assassination, or from other violent causes, focusing instead on those who died due to illness, old age, or other non-violent factors. *
Assuming that chatgpt can read wikipedia pages correctly, it seems that you are right, thanks! If you happen to have links for those archeological studies, I‘d gladly read them.