[thaumasiotes]

> even if your body has had more than enough food to sustain itself for a whole week.

For reference, that amount of food is zero. You're already set for the week.

Animals don't operate like cars where they're constantly on the verge of death.

[Funes-]

To sustain itself... at the same rate it usually does (body fat, muscle...). My comment was extremely easy to grasp. Instead, you twisted what I wrote, clinging to a stupidly literal interpretation of it, and came up with a ridiculous reply, riddled with straw man fallacies. Good job (making a fool out of yourself while trying to one up a stranger on the Internet).

[thaumasiotes]

Think a little further, and you might see that the amount you've recently eaten has very little relevance to how much you need to eat in the near future.

[Funes-]

You didn't get my comment it at first--it's fine, dude. Every other user understood it right away, so no problem.

[thaumasiotes]

What do you see as the significance of the qualifier "even if your body has had more than enough food to sustain itself for a whole week"?