Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dagelf 499 days ago
Xfce is by far the most compatible and easiest to customize, not to mention light weight, both to mention also had decades of dev. And of just wanted a launcher they would've been happy with IceWM. People want stability, interoperability and effortless customizability, with good defaults. Esthetics, nice fonts and themes. Ice has those too, but not in a control panel as such, and rarely bundled.
2 comments

I have for many years helped set up some elderly folks for web access. Since they had less powerful PCs and were familiar with Windows, I used IceWM because it was light and I could make it look like Win98. That took a good deal of configuring, though. As their computers got better, I shifted to Xfce for several years, and have now moved to LXQt. I don't try very hard to make it look like Windows anymore, partly because Windows has become such a mess and partly because I have less energy. If I really wanted a system to look like Classic Windows, I would probably still use Xfce with the XFE tools.
Does XFCE still code the window border grab area inside the theme, and then ship greybird as the default theme with only a 1 pixel.

Awful OOB user experience. Can be made to work great, but full of papercuts for new users.