|
|
|
|
|
|
by grajaganDev
499 days ago
|
|
|
>President can reliably promise under current law, as opposed to needing Congressional involvement? I don't think so and your question was not addressed in the article. Seems like very biased and irresponsible reporting. >Does it apply to people dismissed because the President demanded to know how they voted and didn't like the answer? Good point - I would expect they get nothing. |
|
|
A Not-Actually-Fun-Fact I learned today: Even the Nazis doing their early purge of the German government [0] still found it necessary to offer 3 months of severance and 3/4ths continued pension.
[0] The 1933 legislation was against "officials whose previous political activities do not guarantee that they will always be fully committed to the national state."