[doublerabbit]

Yes, one could say ML could be an application for AI but it's still not Artificial Intelligence.

As an engine is an application for a car, you don't call an engine a car. ML is programmed information, and theres nothing artificial about that.

What is AI about it? Show me something AI from ML.

All algorithms are defined, all tokens are defined. All guardrails are defined.

All of it has been programmed by humans that which isn't artificial.

If it was AI then it would generate itself for itself.

[grajaganDev]

I am offering the generally accepted definitions of these terms as some HN readers might not be familiar with them.

If you don't think that ML is AI, I am fine with that.

[doublerabbit]

Cool. I hate the term of calling AI because its an excuse to throw out a flawed pretentious innovation where by it can be flogged as a product to sucker those who don't know better.

"Cloud Servers" anyone? Glorified dedicated servers.

[jopicornell]

Well, artificial means made by humans, not naturally.

[doublerabbit]

you got me on that one.

I wouldn't classify it as intelligent though. It's still reading a scripture of words.