Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by touristtam 504 days ago
Let's put it that way; It's been days since its been in the public eyes and everyone is talking about it like it is the new ChatGPT. When your non techies friends and family members are coming to you with question about it, you know the reach is wide already. All those people have been primed by months of using ChatGPT or similar /ai/.

So it does come as a plausible explanation.

1 comments

Why is it more plausible than the explanation provided by the company? That's what I'm asking. Especially when you consider the PR downsides of saying your company has been hacked.

Maybe there's a history of the company lying, or some other evidence that it's not an attack that I haven't seen, etc.