[whimsicalism]

no they are not, they intentionally remove every reference to this not being r1 from the cli and changed the names from the ones both Deepseek and Huggingface used.

[blacklightpy]

Yet, I did not see a single issue made on the GitHub repository, and I just made one myself (https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/8698).

[nyrikki]

They used short strings for the names, which is very different from deception.

https://ollama.com/search

> DeepSeek's first-generation of reasoning models with comparable performance to OpenAI-o1, including six dense models distilled from DeepSeek-R1 based on Llama and Qwen.

Well I guess if you are in the Enterprise Java naming model you would expect something like "­Visitor­Model­Utils­List­Getter­Adapter­Interceptor­Message­Manager­Driven­Observer­Pool"

If you look at their API docs you will see:

    model: name of the model to push in the form of <namespace>/<model>:<tag>

I don't think there is any reason to jump to the conclusion it is some type of conspiracy here, just naming things based on a API that probably didn't think about distillation when they created it.