[withinboredom]

> grown by "alpha" leaders and staff.

Umm... isn't the whole point of an "alpha" to be the top-man... so how would there be more than one? That doesn't make any internally logical sense.

> An individual will likely be more productive in the environment best suited for them

Good premise, but you don't need the "alpha" theory to argue it.

> in determining if the "alpha" concept is a "more successful" model in business.

You do a really poor job of explaining what this even means, but it sounds bogus from your description. No offense intended.

[lmm]

> isn't the whole point of an "alpha" to be the top-man... so how would there be more than one?

The point is they're top of their pack, not top of the whole world.

[withinboredom]

Right. And my point is that a “pack” of “alphas” is nonsensical.