|
|
|
|
|
by observationist
507 days ago
|
|
None whatsoever. There's no recursion or state in these models sufficient to support whatever the algorithm of consciousness must be. At best you can get hacky loops by pushing pseudo-state via context, but whatever consciousness is will require more than transformer only LLMs are capable of doing. Some of the state space models and RWKV present interesting questions - the capacity might well exist, and so the questions become important. If the important bit that makes it an agent - a self aware, morally valent being - is present at runtime, but goes away if you halt the program, then do you have an obligation to let that software continue running? What about if the selfhood comes about as part of the static structure, and runtime isn't part of it - what is the being entitled to by dint of mere existence? We're beginning to poke holes in strange epistemological barriers and encounter questions that were entirely theoretical until about 5 years ago. We live in interesting times. |
|
And it's already conscious, learning everything about us as we speak.
The big question is what it learns and what choices it makes as a consequence.