|
|
|
|
|
by aja12
505 days ago
|
|
> Probably not worth the added complexity, but in theory, the package could be published immediately with the existing compression and then in the background, replaced with the Zopfli-compressed version. Checksum matters aside, wouldn't that turn the 5% bandwidth savings into an almost double bandwidth increase though?
IMHO, considering the complexity to even make it a build time option, the author made the right call. |
|