Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hellotomyrars 503 days ago
I 100% agree the issue is more on the capital side. There probably shouldn’t be people who have more money than God who can afford to thrown hundreds of million dollar darts at a wall and see what sticks.

But I still think the downstream effect is an attitude in many SWE that divorce them from reality. Most people don’t get paid incredibly large sums of money on work that amounts to a gamble, with high risk and high reward. The failure rate for small businesses isn’t trivial but they’re not playing in the same part of the casino as tech. Tradespeople aren’t afforded the luxury of building entirely speculative things that are going to be dead within a year or two. People expect their homes and the things in them to have a much longer shelf life.

My point about seeing some of the things Google/Amazon/Apple folks have said regarding the homeless is that those are very much people working in the industry that made Seattle/SF impossible for “normal” people to afford to live in. There are many reasons people become homeless and why they stay that way but being literally priced out of a place you may have been born and raised in and lived for decades is a very special kind of fucked.

That said, if the capital side of things wasn’t the runaway nightmare monster it was, SWE probably would and should be making less than they do now on average.

It costs more to be poor. Closing the gap absolutely means raising the minimum standard of living but wealthy inequality absolutely goes both ways and it isn’t going to get better unless things contract on both ends. Raising things up at the bottom does mean lowering things at the top. The impact isn’t linear though.

Obviously the real world has other ideas but there should be less people with more money than God and that does mean less money for SWEs. But the face value of money and the absolute value of money aren’t the same either.

But I also don’t things are going to be getting better anytime soon so it’s somewhat of a moot point. The incentives aren’t aligned and unfortunately the people who are playing an idle game are going to squeeze every last cent out of the people who can still afford to buy food to feed their family, but only just.