|
|
|
|
|
|
by dnamlin
507 days ago
|
|
|
That was so funny they left out "and returns" Like, it's valid to point to its historical volatility, but it struck me as intellectually dishonest to say it's been (historically) risky without also acknowledging that holders have (historically) been well-rewarded for their risk appetite. High Sharpe ratio, etc. |
|
|