[gray_-_wolf]

What I find interesting is that the project claims MIT license, but if it is "almost entirely" AI generated, I am not sure it even is copyrightable. So either the licensing terms deserve some large disclaimers, or it is not "almost entirely" made with AI. Based on the name I assume it is your project, could you shed some light on which of those two options is correct?

[andix]

I guess copyright laws treat AIs as tools. If you paint a picture with a brush it's also almost entirely "brush created", and still you can claim copyright for it.

[williamcotton]

There are differing levels of abstraction when considering copyright.