|
|
|
|
|
by tuvang
518 days ago
|
|
I figured it is because most things in nature exist in multitudes, so there being 0 indicates an absence of multitude. For example: There are trees in this field. There are 0 trees in this field. Singular is the special case, similar to square x rectangle relation. |
|
The singular equivalent would be perhaps "non-" or "-less".
Hot take: zero is a math concept and math deals with multitudes only (even under one, you're dealing with a multitude of parts). The actual irregularity is the usage of singular noun form in a math context.