[ilove196884]

I hate how paper titles are worded like seo techniques.

[spiritplumber]

Turn something into a metric and it will be misused. Ever always was

[jampekka]

Attention is all you need!

[visarga]

138,000 papers are "X is all you need", now 138,001

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ro&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22i...

[hatthew]

640 if you use intitle, exclude citations, and filter to 2017 onwards

[llm_trw]

The attention economy and its consequences.

[littlestymaar]

Unexpected Kaczynski.

[TeMPOraL]

> Ever always was

Always has been.

silent gunshot

[verdverm]

This is a riff on the original "attention is all you need" paper, there has been a few of these lately

[Matthyze]

A few? A multitude.

[verdverm]

This one might be right if they have in fact unified multiple attention approaches into a single framework

see Section 3.4

[LPisGood]

Having a catchy title is great for short hand. If it didn’t have such a catchy name I probably wouldn’t remember Flush+Reload, Spectre, or even Attention is All You Need

[Upvoter33]

On the one hand, sure, it's dumb.

But, on the other hand, it's hard to get researchers to read your paper, esp. in fast-moving areas. Every little thing might be the difference between reading the abstract or not. Reading the abstract might lead to reading the intro. And so on.

So, for better or worse, the competition for human eyeballs is real.

Ironically, in this case, "attention" is all that the authors want.