[remram]

> f"{n} result{'s' if n == 1 else ''}"

n>1 is even shorter than n!=1

(also you wrote == instead of != your code is backwards)

[antiframe]

But the whole point is that "0 result" is not correct but "0 results" is.

[remram]

The question is why is "0 results" correct. hyrix's answer is so that you have a simple equation for plural, my response is that if "0 result" was correct we would have an even simpler equation.

[DonHopkins]

That makes -infinity ... -1 singular too.