[petesergeant]

Yes, I do actually. I don't think they hide politically inconvenient and well-documented facts that can be trivially found on Wikipedia. All will happily tell you about Epstein plus the current CiC, however much he'd probably rather it didn't. It doesn't shy away from talking about the "original sin" of the US.

[ekianjo]

> well-documented facts that can be trivially found on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is far from being an unbiased source for some of its parts since most of its "facts" come from the newspaper industry which is certainly not neutral on certain topics.

[exoverito]

They just hide different politically inconvenient and well-documented facts, for example natural human variation between races. Most progressives still subscribe to a Rousseauian blank slatist perspective which has been falsified a thousand which ways.

[petesergeant]

What information from the Wikipedia article on Race and Intelligence is getting censored by American tech companies in their language models?