|
|
|
|
|
|
by cies
520 days ago
|
|
|
> it is clear that Russia’s current trajectory is not sustainable beyond a year or so Those cheering for Ukraine have been saying this from the start. They have been lying again, and again, about everything... The Russian MoD has been on point, again and again. Why should I trust anything camp NATO/Ukraine says? The reality on the battlefield is that NATO/Ukraine loses badly, while spending much/much/much more money. Donated money. Sorry bro: it's a lost cause. The russians will be victorious again, fixing Europe's nazi problem again. Everyone who teaches their kid "Bandera is my papa, Ukraine is my momma" is a nazi to me. And according to my research, that's a lot of the Ukrainian speaking Ukrainians. |
|
|
NATO isn't even on the battlefield.
> while spending much/much/much more money.
Yes, western labor has more value per hour, so the $ value of the smaller share of western effort devoted to the support of Ukraine is much higher than the $ value of the much larger share of Russian effort.
> Donated money.
See, you have to decide on your narrative. If your narrative is that NATO is who your Russian buddies are fighting on the battlefield, then it isn't donated money. If your narrative is "donated money", then you have to drop the "NATO/Ukraine" description of the belligerent opposing Russia.