[gruez]

>The argument can be made that LLMs could not be created without expropriating the original works of all the authors they were trained on, and that argument would in fact be true and have quite sturdy legs as far as I’m concerned.

That makes as much sense as "American industry was built on the backs of British inventors (back it the day it was the "China" when it came to IP), so Britain should get perpetual (?) royalties from the US economy".

[anileated]

So we’re back the human vs. unthinking machine distinction. American inventors were human. We’re going in circles and this article was hidden on HN anyway.