[wredcoll]

> One might also wonder why policymakers haven't fried these bigger fish that would improve conditions for female prisoners and female athletes, and instead have chosen to introduce gender self-id policy which demonstrably harms women and girls while privileging males.

If you keep repeating this, maybe you'll convince some people who desperately want to believe it.

And I don't really need to wonder why. Because they obviously don't care except when they can invoke "won't somebody think of [the women]" as a convenient excuse to achieve political power.

It's exactly as dishonest and intellectually bankrupt as "advocating for the unborn".

[wastle]

> If you keep repeating this, maybe you'll convince some people

I have helped some people understand the full impact of such policy, yes.

In my experience, it depends on whether the person I'm talking to has an interest in the wellbeing of women and girls, and is even slightly open to challenging their current understanding with new information.

> dishonest and intellectually bankrupt

Evidence-based and built upon feminist principles, actually.