[fallinditch]

Ooops you did it again! Good analysis.

It makes me think: we may be living in a golden age when human analysis and thought still produce the most interesting content. Soon AI-assisted content generation processes will take the next evolutionary step: doing proactive analysis and concept development with the human being more like the back seat driver and director.

AI powered writing assistants, music generators, life coaches, etc, will get so good that authentic solo human creation may become a rarity.

(Tangentially, if you ask Perplexity for tips on writing blog posts that are likely to go viral on HN you'll get the above post, only 6 hours old, as a reference)

[wirtzdan]

Don‘t you think there could be a world where the link to something human might triumph what an AI can generate.

For example: Music is not only about how good it sounds. But also a lot about who the singer is. Their history. What they stand for and what story is behind a album or song.

With AI, I don’t see that we will ever reach that dimension. Expect maybe when AI becomes sentient?

[fallinditch]

Yes I believe that authentic human creativity is mostly better than artificial. It's like when drum machines became popular in music in the early 80s there was consternation in some circles that this would be the end of drummers. But good drummers like John Bonham, Tony Allen or Vinnie Colaiuta are like magicians whose artistry cannot be replicated in machine form ... but on the other hand drum machines, and electronic 'machine' music enabled incredible vistas of musical creativity.

So maybe AI in music is just another creative toolset that can be used well or badly. My DAW for music creation has auto mastering powered by AI/ML, it does a good job although not as good as a skilled mastering engineer. AI plugins for music composition in DAWs must already exist, they will inevitably get better and more powerful. So I see it as a phenomenon of AI creeping in to our lives rather than a binary dichotomy.

I do think it's problematic - this whole area of AI disrupting the creative arts, and human endeavor in general. I think it's going to carry on creeping into our human creative processes, as new standards of practice and AI acceptance become the norm. We'll still appreciate live musicianship but we won't completely believe it unless we experience it in a live performance.

I agree, the human perspective will remain crucial. I'm torn between being excited by AI-powered creativity and being turned off by it. I will certainly carry on exploring advanced AI tools for writing, music, visual art, etc. for the time being.

For example, I would love to chat with a bot that has a huge memory and context, like a relationship and collaborator, and to train it over many months of conversations so that it becomes like an authentic extension of my creative brain. Then together we could write some serious shit, I'm sure. I think that in the future there may be books written this way that will come to be considered as great works of literature.

But after I play around with AI tools for some time I think I will get bored and will wish to return to a simpler more organic life. Throw away my phone and pick up a paint brush :-)