|
|
|
|
|
by jcims
515 days ago
|
|
I'm confident there are examples but I've yet to see anyone artfully navigate this. A few years ago a bunch of folks I followed started adding politics to the list of things they would regularly talk about, which I fully support. But I don't owe them my attention and when the topics start to just become a steady stream of undifferentiated ranting about political topics I'm out. Then they would invariably take a self-righteous position to explain the drop in their numbers as people that 'can't handle the truth' and that they are better off without them, when the reality is that they
mostly just spammed themselves out of an audience. Do what you like of course, but for me unless the person is bringing new information or context to the conversation I'm out. |
|