Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Retric 520 days ago
The specific situation applied in Burdick.

The court ruled they could reject a pardon given before prosecution thus avoiding the need to testify about someone else. It would be a moot point if the pardon was invalid.

1 comments

To be clear "they" (who can reject a person) is the recipient of the pardon, not the court.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States

But that's not the relevant part of Burdock for this thread.

The relevant part is that an (accepted!) pardon does apply before indictment.