|
|
|
|
|
|
by joenot443
517 days ago
|
|
|
> How did you manage to reach this conclusion? I think it's fairly obvious, no? The originally presented case was that Trump had received payment for assuring TikTok's survival. I've noted a few times in this thread that this is a really poor framing, and that it's more likely his actions were motivated by politics, not fiduciary gain. |
|
|