|
|
|
|
|
by erebe__
521 days ago
|
|
I will give it a shot next week to try out ;P For this particular service, the size does not matter really. For others, it makes more diff (several hundred of Mb) and as we deploy on customers infra, we want images' size to stay reasonable.
For now, we apply the same build rules for all our services to stay consistent. |
|
Smaller executables are more for things like reducing distribution sizes, or reducing process launch latency when disk throughput is the issue. When you invoke compression, you are explicitly trading off runtime performance in order to get the benefit of smaller on-disk or network transmission size. For a hosted service, that's usually not a good tradeoff.