[ben_w]

What is "self-sufficient" in this case?

Lots of debate since ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion can be summarised as A: "AI cheated by copying humans, it just mixes the bits up really small like a collage" B: "So like humans learning from books and studying artists?" A: "That doesn't count, it's totally different"

Even though I am quite happy to agree that differences exist, I have yet to see a clear answer as to what about people even mean when asserting that AI learning from books is "cheating" given that it's *mandatory* for humans in most places.

[nurettin]

I just think that language is a big part of the puzzle, but it is not the only one. Simply generating tokens may sometimes look like thought, but as you feed the output back at itself, it quickly devolves into repeating nonsense and looks nothing like introspection. Self-sufficiency would reliably form new ideas and angles.