[sirisaysgpt]

There is a statement from India’s information technology ministry, after 20 Indian soldiers died during border skirmish with China. When India banned TikTok in 2020 [0]

> Chinese mobile apps were stealing and surreptitiously transmitting users’ data.

> The compilation of such data, and its mining and profiling by elements hostile to India is a matter of very deep and immediate concern which requires emergency measures

[0] https://apnews.com/article/bd02ecd62ff9da6b1301868f0308e297

[potamic]

If they were really concerned about privacy, they would strengthen privacy laws. Adopt a GDPR like framework with opt-in consent and force platforms to implement a GrapheneOS like model with mock permissions and scoped consent. Banning apps is just a veiled attempt to appease other interests.

[tushar-r]

You mean like the DPDPA [1]?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Personal_Data_Protecti...

[potamic]

DPDP is a watered down version of GDPR and is not as broad with its definition of personal data. Also for a privacy act, it does not have any directives on pseudonymization. But the worst part of DPDP is it makes it illegal for users to provide false information irrespective whether there is an intent to commit fraud. The jury is out whether one can be prosecuted for using an alias online or providing a fake location to an app.

[pixelatedindex]

India is also an authoritarian government, is that something to celebrate? Also it is hilarious that they complain about TikTok but when you live in India, you realize that half their mobile phones themselves are from Chinese manufacturers. Some of them have Indian manufacturing units but it doesn’t take much scrutiny to realize that this is all political theater.

[rsanek]

huge false equivalency. true India is maybe not a model image of a democracy but they are way more free than China. take a look at the freedom house reports for more details.