| > some land was made available to the Native Americans to build their own sovereign nation, you would be against that ? You know that would have been great. But who are the native Americans in your example? Majority of Zionists that established Israel and their groups arrived by ships from Europe. Wouldn't that more resemble England and Spain colonization expeditions in your example? Weird.. like the story almost matches exactly to the how colonies were established Such an ironic example to give voluntarily. Let's take a look at the background of Israel's founding fathers and where did they came from: - David Ben-Gurion - Poland - Aharon Zisling - Belarus - David Remez - Russia - Pinchas Rosen - Germany - Moshe Sharett - Ukraine - Haim-Moshe Shapira - Belarus - Yehuda Leib Maimon - Moldova - Mordechai Bentov - Russia - ... Case in point, most weren't natives who lived there under "apartheid" but actually left Europe looking for a new land, backed by... England and the US (Sorry Spain, not this time). If you're struggling to use the real events in history and have to resort to a "hypothesis", it's a sign something is off and you're twisting history a bit too much. At least make sure it's not ironic, next time. |
It's unsurprising that many wouldn't want to reintegrate with that society after what they experienced, even if they managed to avoid the camps (and especially if they didn't).
It is ridiculous to just throw them into the same category with the English and Spanish colonists searching for riches in the New World.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kielce_pogrom