|
|
|
|
|
by leoqa
526 days ago
|
|
I think there is a really nuanced check-and-balance system that has extreme visibility for the federal legal system: - investigators need approval from a prosecutor to move forward with investigations, and ultimately have to present their evidence in sales calls to their boss/peers. It’s a lot of red tape. - prosecutors have bosses and reputations to uphold, they don’t want to take on risk. - judges act as a procedural review for the prosecutor and watchdog for civil liberties - the defense is red teaming the prosecutor and investigators for fraud etc - the appeals court acts as a second level review for everyone + original judge - it’s all public so journalists can poke around. |
|