|
|
|
|
|
by rmgk
526 days ago
|
|
The point in the Article is that Meta used LibGen to train, not legally obtained books from their local library.
The problem is that if you and I made use of LibGen and some of the “right holders” (more likely some IP specialized law firms) realized that, we would be prosecuted. Giving Meta exclusive access to those copies is the problem (which is effectively what we are doing if they are not prosecuted, or, alternatively, if we accepted that LibGen is fair use for everyone). |
|