Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by njitbew 514 days ago
> Horrible dev experience, no decent clients/libs, complex pricing, weird scaling in/out mechanism, slow, it only works well for well defined use-cases.

Most of these arguments probably don't outweigh the benefits. If you're in need of a managed, highly-consistent, highly-scalable, distributed database, and you're already an AWS customer, what would you use instead?

2 comments

Aurora Serverless Postgres e.g.
Completely different use cases....
Postgres running in a computer.