|
|
|
|
|
by Panzer04
527 days ago
|
|
Huh, interesting. I guess there's probably more accidents in urban areas, but thanks to lower speeds fewer fatalities. I don't quite follow the second point - my presumption is that the chance of a bike hurting a pedestrian is lower than a car doing the same, and the chance of causing a fatality is, in general, reasonably low compared to getting hit by a car. Stats would probably be hard to gather - there's probably quite a few bikes hitting pedestrians, but in all likelyhood many incidents go unreported if no one is injured. |
|
IE the number of serious accidents depends on the number of accidents times the risk of each individual accident and bikes are far less segregated from pedestrians than cars.