[heyflyguy]

Are we trying to slow global competition with bad actors by restricting their ability to run compute on these.

And then we don't want GPT4o closed models going over the fence, but we are ok with Llama3.3?

I am I reading this correctly?

[gosub100]

You and I have to compete in this "competitive" job market thanks to AI, but we can't have US megacorps compete with China who might develop better tools used to swindle us.

[agilob]

>Are we trying to slow global competition with bad actors by restricting their ability to run compute on these.

Huawei GPUs

[bayindirh]

> but we are ok with Llama3.3?

Considering Meta's view about the new president, the new Llama might become closed source at any moment now.

[kcb]

In seriousness, this make Meta's decision to push open weight models incredibly valuable. Now there's no restrictions on their geographic use or "Security Standards" unlike their competitors.

[bayindirh]

Yes. I'm also a big supporter of open-weight models. Hope they don't touch it and continue down that path.

I actually prefer "reproducible" models with their code and training data attached, but we don't live in that world, yet.