|
|
|
|
|
by pcthrowaway
522 days ago
|
|
Consider a disease like rabies. Right now there's a near-zero chance of survival to those who contract it. Let's say we discover a new mosquito variant which can spread rabies, whose population is multiplying exponentially. Typically we might expect a disease which becomes pandemic to be survivable for some significant percentage of the population. Whereas here we might say that, regardless of how many resources we throw at rabies treatments, there may continue to be a near-zero chance of survival (because rabies had been remarkably untreatable so far). It's a suggestion that perhaps we should temper optimism. |
|
Technically, you're right. May be there's no chance to fix it. But may be false vacuum will decay tomorrow. "may be" is not very useful here.
Is it probable that we're beyond the point of no return? I don't believe anyone can answer that with any certainty.