|
|
|
|
|
|
by gaganyaan
521 days ago
|
|
|
The fixation on genitals in this discourse is weird. It's an argument that tries to say "if you don't agree with me, you're a pervert that just thinks about genitals". Men vs women can be clearly distinguished in many different ways while keeping their clothes on. Why bother trying to push a narrative that is obviously false? Is it an Emperor's New Clothes situation? |
|
|
It doesn't come from me. It comes from the people who demand purely biological definitions of "man" and "woman".
> It's an argument that tries to say "if you don't agree with me, you're a pervert that just thinks about genitals".
I didn't say anything about perversion.
> Men vs women can be clearly distinguished in many different ways while keeping their clothes on.
Highly inaccurately. For some damn reason, I've been called "ma'am" way too often, for example by grocery and retail store employees. I guess it's because of my height, which is shorter than average. (I don't have long hair, in case you're wondering.) Anyway, it really pisses me off, massive disrespect.